At Idean UK we’ve always tried to create an environment where everyone can do great work. And we mean everyone. Because a diverse team, where everyone is doing great work, creates better outcomes for us, our clients and, importantly, the people who use the things we design and build.
What became clear to us earlier this year is that our past efforts to build diverse teams were, while well-intended and executed considerately, not having the impact we needed them to.
Caring is very different from an invested-in commitment which shapes all of a business’ operations. Reflecting now, we feel we didn’t give our diversity, inclusion and belonging efforts enough focus as feedback on our culture was overwhelmingly positive.
We think this is something that many companies with a ‘good culture’ will stumble with. We now understand that this kind of thinking will have effectively made us blind to any wider problems that might have existed across the business over time.
So where did we go wrong, and what are we doing about it?
Over recent years, our diversity and inclusion efforts have shaped our broader People and Talent efforts.
We’ve partnered with organisations whose mission it is to change the makeup of our industry (shout out to Muslamic Makers, Triangirls and Somalis in Tech). We’ve developed a strong network of people managers across the business, who play a leading role in our team feeling cared for. We’ve listened and acted as team members have come to us with their problems and challenges when they’ve needed our help and support.
But until this year we weren’t measuring the effectiveness of these efforts. We hadn’t explicitly asked our team if our system was serving their needs, specifically from an inclusion and belonging perspective.
At the beginning of 2020, we faced the consequences of what started to feel like a fairly uncoordinated effort, missing an overarching plan. We were growing fast and needed to hire people at speed. Our team did a great job of bringing in a great group of talented individuals but unfortunately, once we took a step back, we realised that this group at the time was 100% White.
This was recognised by Leadership, our Talent team and the Studio as an issue, and a missed opportunity. What it highlighted was that we needed to do things differently and prioritise hiring underrepresented talent more than we had been – something which our team gave feedback on when we ran our first diversity, inclusion and belonging survey in April.
What also became clear was that while our initial concerns had been around diversity, we also needed to address some challenges related to inclusion and belonging. With hindsight this is not surprising but it further reinforced the realisation that now was the time to change our approach.
Shortly after, at a scale not felt in recent decades, the world began reckoning with the racist systems and structures around us, giving even more weight to the actions we needed to take.
Something which we previously hadn’t given enough consideration is that we’re not neutral as a business. We’ve been busy building a system of many processes and structures, and throughout that time we’ve made an enormous amount of decisions about how things should work, how our people are encouraged to behave, and what our culture practically means day to day.
We’re thoughtful by nature, but we’ve never really stopped and made sense of this responsibility in a way that fully reflected what was needed to make our culture work for every current and potential member of our team. Especially since scaling the business to the size that it is today.
“Recognise [patterns of harm]…and create strategies to resolve existing issues and avoid further damage.”
We’ve taken comfort in our historically strong gender balance – the Idean UK team is 51% female. This is certainly something to celebrate but it can’t be used to mask our lower-than-we’d-like representation of minority ethnic populations – 12% of our team is Black, Asian or another minority ethnicity and 3% of our team is Black. (The team data included here was collected during our anonymous April 2020 survey and some of these numbers may have changed since.)
We want to build a better studio – one which promotes greater inclusion and belonging. There have been a lot of smart words written about inclusion-first efforts, which we overwhelmingly support. But we also believe that representation matters and continuing to connect with and hire underrepresented talent is also a priority of ours.
Today we know there’s still a way to go, but we’re proud to say that we have been doing some things very differently in recent months.
Our efforts this year have seen us listen to our team, start new conversations, evaluate our processes, and start to shape better behaviours at Idean UK:
We’re also in the privileged position to be able to help our clients deliver products and services that cater for a diverse set of users.
Many people talk about inclusive design, but what does it mean in practice? It’s not just about designing accessible products. It’s about creating inclusive things by default. Things that everyone can enjoy and which makes them feel like they belong.
We’ve been sharing the tools and processes we use to embed inclusive design into our projects, so others can make inclusive design a priority at their organisation:
We encourage you to take a look at your ‘good culture’. What does that mean, really?
Positivity is a great quality for a workplace, but positivity can also mask problems. We need to face the facts of a lack of diversity in our industry – and that means actively seeking that feedback from employees and fellow team members. And then doing something about it.
frog, part of Capgemini Invent is a global design and innovation firm. We transform businesses at scale by creating systems of brand, product and service that deliver a distinctly better experience. We strive to touch hearts and move markets. Our passion is to transform ideas into realities. We partner with clients to anticipate the future, evolve organizations and advance the human experience.
We respect your privacy